Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/16808
Title: Productivity differences between organic and other vegetable farming systems in northern Thailand
Contributor(s): Kramol, Prathanthip (author); Villano, Renato (author); Kristiansen, Paul (author)orcid ; Fleming, Euan (author)
Publication Date: 2015
DOI: 10.1017/S1742170513000288
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/16808
Abstract: We analyzed the productivity levels of smallholder farms in northern Thailand practicing different 'clean and safe' vegetable farming systems or conventional vegetable (CV) production. 'Clean and safe' farmers are categorized into three groups based on their use of synthetic chemicals: organic, pesticide-free and safe-use. Farm-level data on vegetable production were collected from random samples of farms operating these farming systems. A standard stochastic production frontier model and a metafrontier model were estimated for each system to obtain estimates of technical efficiency (TE) with respect to their cohorts, metatechnology ratios (MTRs, showing the extent of technology gaps between farming systems) and overall productivity measures. Productivity levels were found to vary moderately between farming systems. 'Clean and safe' farms achieved a higher mean TE score than conventional farms, indicating a more efficient use of inputs in producing a certain level of output within their system. However, their MTRs were significantly lower than those of conventional farmers, indicating greater production technology constraints because of the need to conform to strict guidelines. All four farming systems had at least one farmer who could overcome the technological constraints to achieve the highest possible output regardless of the technology used. Effective assistance providers were found to be crucial for farmers to achieve high productivity in the organic farming system. Improvements are needed to raise low productivity levels through technology transfer, value chain improvement and farmer capacity in production and marketing. The required improvement strategies differ among farming systems.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 30(2), p. 154-169
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 1742-1713
1742-1705
Field of Research (FOR): 070106 Farm Management, Rural Management and Agribusiness
140201 Agricultural Economics
140205 Environment and Resource Economics
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 446
Views: 502
Downloads: 1
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
UNE Business School

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Nov 26, 2018

Page view(s)

186
checked on Mar 19, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

 

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

 

Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.