Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/16808
Title: | Productivity differences between organic and other vegetable farming systems in northern Thailand | Contributor(s): | Kramol, Prathanthip (author); Villano, Renato (author) ; Kristiansen, Paul (author) ; Fleming, Euan (author) | Publication Date: | 2015 | DOI: | 10.1017/S1742170513000288 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/16808 | Abstract: | We analyzed the productivity levels of smallholder farms in northern Thailand practicing different 'clean and safe' vegetable farming systems or conventional vegetable (CV) production. 'Clean and safe' farmers are categorized into three groups based on their use of synthetic chemicals: organic, pesticide-free and safe-use. Farm-level data on vegetable production were collected from random samples of farms operating these farming systems. A standard stochastic production frontier model and a metafrontier model were estimated for each system to obtain estimates of technical efficiency (TE) with respect to their cohorts, metatechnology ratios (MTRs, showing the extent of technology gaps between farming systems) and overall productivity measures. Productivity levels were found to vary moderately between farming systems. 'Clean and safe' farms achieved a higher mean TE score than conventional farms, indicating a more efficient use of inputs in producing a certain level of output within their system. However, their MTRs were significantly lower than those of conventional farmers, indicating greater production technology constraints because of the need to conform to strict guidelines. All four farming systems had at least one farmer who could overcome the technological constraints to achieve the highest possible output regardless of the technology used. Effective assistance providers were found to be crucial for farmers to achieve high productivity in the organic farming system. Improvements are needed to raise low productivity levels through technology transfer, value chain improvement and farmer capacity in production and marketing. The required improvement strategies differ among farming systems. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 30(2), p. 154-169 | Publisher: | Cambridge University Press | Place of Publication: | United Kingdom | ISSN: | 1742-1713 1742-1705 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 070106 Farm Management, Rural Management and Agribusiness 140201 Agricultural Economics 140205 Environment and Resource Economics |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 300208 Farm management, rural management and agribusiness 380101 Agricultural economics 380105 Environment and resource economics |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 910210 Production 820215 Vegetables 910404 Productivity (excl. Public Sector) |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 150304 Productivity (excl. public sector) 150510 Production 260512 Protected vegetable crops |
Peer Reviewed: | Yes | HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Environmental and Rural Science UNE Business School |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format |
---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
18
checked on Aug 3, 2024
Page view(s)
1,862
checked on Aug 11, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.