Does morphology predict trophic position and habitat use of ant species and assemblages?

Title
Does morphology predict trophic position and habitat use of ant species and assemblages?
Publication Date
2015
Author(s)
Gibb, Heloise
Stoklosa, Jakub
Warton, David I
Brown, A M
Andrew, Nigel R
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2850-2307
Email: nandrew@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:nandrew
Cunningham, S M
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Springer
Place of publication
Germany
DOI
10.1007/s00442-014-3101-9
UNE publication id
une:16878
Abstract
A functional traits-based theory of organismal communities is critical for understanding the principles underlying community assembly, and predicting responses to environmental change. This is particularly true for terrestrial arthropods, of which only 20 % are described. Using epigaeic ant assemblages, we asked: (1) can we use morphological variation among species to predict trophic position or preferred microhabitat; (2) does the strength of morphological associations suggest recent trait divergence; (3) do environmental variables at site scale predict trait sets for whole assemblages? We pitfall-trapped ants from a revegetation chronosequence and measured their morphology, trophic position [using C:N stoichiometry and stable isotope ratios (δ)] and characteristics of microhabitat and macrohabitat. We found strong associations between high trophic position (low C:N and high δ¹⁵N) in body tissue and morphological traits: predators were larger, had more laterally positioned eyes, more physical protection and tended to be monomorphic. In addition, morphological traits were associated with certain microhabitat features, e.g. smaller heads were associated with the bare ground microhabitat. Trait-microhabitat relationships were more pronounced when phylogenetic adjustments were used, indicating a strong influence of recent trait divergences. At the assemblage level, our fourth corner analysis revealed associations between the prevalence of traits and macrohabitat, although these associations were not the same as those based on microhabitat associations. This study shows direct links between species-level traits and both diet and habitat preference. Trait-based prediction of ecological roles and community structure is thus achievable when integrating stoichiometry, morphology and phylogeny, but scale is an important consideration in such predictions.
Link
Citation
Oecologia, 177(2), p. 519-531
ISSN
1432-1939
0029-8549
Start page
519
End page
531

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink
closed/SOURCE01.pdf 937.001 KB application/pdf publisher version (hidden) View document
administrative/MODS.xml 5.95 KB MODS.xml View document
open/SOURCE03.pdf 725.988 KB application/pdf Post-peer review version View document
open/FULLTEXT_SOURCE03.txt 69.601 KB Post-peer review version View document
open/PREMIS_SOURCE03.xml 0.92 KB PREMIS Metadata View document
open/THUMBNAIL_SOURCE03.jpg 15.358 KB Thumbnail View document
open/JHOVE_SOURCE03.xml 0.596 KB JHOVE Technical Metadata View document