Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||From Republican to Liberal Liberty||Contributor(s):||Ghosh, Eric (author)||Publication Date:||2008||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/1659||Fields of Research (FoR) 2008:||220210 History of Philosophy||Abstract:||Philip Pettit's narrative of the eclipse of republican by liberal liberty in late eighteenth-century Britain adds colour and plausibility to his analytical contrast between republican and liberal liberty. The narrative supports his argument that republicanism and liberalism can be helpfully contrasted in terms of non-domination and non- interference conceptions of liberty. While the narrative has not been scrutinized in the literature, it is in fact flawed. The flaws raise new questions about how stringent a value liberty as non-domination is and what motivated the value. The flaws also raise new questions about the significance of liberty as non-interference within the very strand of liberalism that Pettit focuses upon. Finally, the article casts doubt on some aspects of Quentin Skinner's interpretation of republican liberty.||Publication Type:||Journal Article||Source of Publication:||History of Political Thought, 29(1), p. 132-167||Publisher:||Imprint Academic||Place of Publication:||Exeter, United Kingdom||ISSN:||0143-781X||Peer Reviewed:||Yes||HERDC Category Description:||C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal||Other Links:||http://openurl.ingenta.com/content?genre=article&issn=0143-781X&volume=29&issue=1&page=132&epage=167||Statistics to Oct 2018:||Visitors: 47|
|Appears in Collections:||Journal Article|
Files in This Item:
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.