Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/16524
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBhullar, Navjoten
dc.contributor.authorMcShane, Michelleen
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-21T14:13:00Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationAbstracts of 49th APS Annual Conference, p. 104-104en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/16524-
dc.description.abstractWood smoke has been linked to serious negative health impacts such as respiratory disorders and cognitive decline in the elderly. Traditional health risk communication models focus on educating and providing risk information about the perceived threat (e.g., Witte, 1992). However, such models downplay the complex nature of the public's understanding of risk information. Communicating effective messages is crucial to encourage positive, protective behaviour change. The extended parallel processing model offers a practical framework to examine how messages may be processed, and subsequently accepted or rejected. The present study investigated the effectiveness of a range of wood smoke messages comprising Threat, Efficacy, or both, in motivating message acceptance (or rejection). Participants (N = 225, Mage=35.32 years, SD=13.6, 53.8% male) were randomly assigned to one of the four experimental conditions: (1) Threat only - participants viewed a message depicting "threat"; (2) Efficacy only - participants viewed a message depicting "efficacy"; (3) Threat and Efficacy - participants viewed a message depicting both "threat" and "efficacy"; and (4) neither Threat nor Efficacy (control). After viewing a message, participants completed a range of measures assessing their perceived levels of response efficacy, self-efficacy, threat susceptibility, threat severity, danger control (message acceptance), and fear control (message rejection). A 2x 2 analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant main effects of Threat only and Efficacy only for danger control responses. The ANOVA results for fear control responses found significant main effect of the Threat only and the Threat by Efficacy interaction. Post-hoc analyses revealed that participants in the Threat only condition reported significantly higher fear control responses. Follow-up multiple mediation analyses found that the Efficacy message component impacted danger control by increasing response efficacy, self-efficacy, and threat susceptibility. On the other hand, the Threat message component influenced fear control via threat susceptibility and threat severity, with the higher reported levels of the threat severity associated with lower fear control. The present findings may help inform and guide real-world education campaigns to reduce wood smoke pollution. Implications are discussed regarding the optimum use of Efficacy and Threat components in increasing the effectiveness of communication strategies.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherAustralian Psychological Societyen
dc.relation.ispartofAbstracts of 49th APS Annual Conferenceen
dc.titleWhat's in the message? Applying extended parallel process model to wood smoke pollution messagesen
dc.typeConference Publicationen
dc.relation.conferenceAPS 2014: 49th Australian Psychological Society Annual Conferenceen
dc.subject.keywordsSocial and Community Psychologyen
dc.subject.keywordsPsychological Methodology, Design and Analysisen
dc.subject.keywordsHealth, Clinical and Counselling Psychologyen
local.contributor.firstnameNavjoten
local.contributor.firstnameMichelleen
local.subject.for2008170110 Psychological Methodology, Design and Analysisen
local.subject.for2008170113 Social and Community Psychologyen
local.subject.for2008170106 Health, Clinical and Counselling Psychologyen
local.subject.seo2008920405 Environmental Healthen
local.subject.seo2008920499 Public Health (excl. Specific Population Health) not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo2008960199 Air Quality not elsewhere classifieden
local.profile.schoolSchool of Psychologyen
local.profile.emailnbhulla2@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryE3en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20150120-134935en
local.date.conference30th September - 3rd October, 2014en
local.conference.placeHobart, Australiaen
local.publisher.placeMelbourne, Australiaen
local.identifier.runningnumberPaper #137en
local.format.startpage104en
local.format.endpage104en
local.contributor.lastnameBhullaren
local.contributor.lastnameMcShaneen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:nbhulla2en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:mmcshaneen
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-1616-6094en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:16762en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleWhat's in the message? Applying extended parallel process model to wood smoke pollution messagesen
local.output.categorydescriptionE3 Extract of Scholarly Conference Publicationen
local.relation.urlhttp://www.psychology.org.au/publications/conferences/abstracts/en
local.relation.urlhttp://www.psychology.org.au/Assets/Files/Hobart-2014-Conference-Abstracts-19Nov14.pdfen
local.conference.detailsAPS 2014: 49th Australian Psychological Society Annual Conference, Hobart, Australia, 30th September - 3rd October, 2014en
local.search.authorBhullar, Navjoten
local.search.authorMcShane, Michelleen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2014-
local.subject.for2020520105 Psychological methodology, design and analysisen
local.subject.for2020420403 Psychosocial aspects of childbirth and perinatal mental healthen
local.subject.seo2020200499 Public health (excl. specific population health) not elsewhere classifieden
local.date.start2014-09-30-
local.date.end2014-10-03-
Appears in Collections:Conference Publication
School of Psychology
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,776
checked on Jun 18, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.