Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Body mass dependent use of hibernation: why not prolong the active season, if they can?||Contributor(s):||Bieber, Claudia (author); Lebl, Karin (author); Stalder, Gabrielle (author); Geiser, Fritz (author) ; Ruf, Thomas (author)||Publication Date:||2014||Open Access:||Yes||DOI:||10.1111/1365-2435.12173||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/16113||Abstract:||Hibernation is the most effective means for energy conservation during winter in mammals. The drawbacks of deep and prolonged torpor include reduced,immunocompetence, and consequently, hibernators should be selected to minimize torpor expression when climatic conditions or energy availability (e.g. food or fat stores) permit. Therefore, it seems surprising that some hibernators employ extraordinary long hibernation seasons, lasting well beyond periods with unfavourable conditions. Because of their extended use of torpor, edible dormice ('Glis glis') provide an ideal model for scrutinizing interactions between energy reserves (i.e. body fat stores) and thermoregulatory patterns. We used a multimodel inference approach to analyse body temperature data (i.e. use of torpor) from 42 entire hibernation seasons over 4 years in females in relation to body mass. Body mass prior to hibernation did not affect the duration of the hibernation season, but animals hibernated for 'c'. 8 months, that is, 2 months longer than required by environmental conditions. Fatter individuals aroused significantly more often, had a higher mean minimum body temperature during torpor and remained euthermic for longer periods than leaner animals. Surplus energy was therefore not used to shorten the hibernation season, but to rewarm more frequently, and to allow shallower torpor bouts. These adjustments apparently serve to avoid negative effects of torpor and, perhaps equally importantly, to minimize the time active above-ground. We argue that maintaining a short active season, despite surplus energy reserves, may be explained by known beneficial effects of hibernation on survival rates (via predator avoidance). Our data provide quantitative evidence that hibernation is a flexible tool within life-history strategies. We conclude that, apart from energetic necessities due to harsh environmental conditions, predator avoidance may be an important factor influencing patterns of hibernation and torpor in mammals. Thus, our study indicates that climatic conditions alone are not a good predictor of hibernation patterns or survival in hibernating species during global climate change.||Publication Type:||Journal Article||Source of Publication:||Functional Ecology, 28(1), p. 167-177||Publisher:||Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd||Place of Publication:||United Kingdom||ISSN:||1365-2435
|Field of Research (FOR):||060806 Animal Physiological Ecology||Socio-Economic Outcome Codes:||970106 Expanding Knowledge in the Biological Sciences||Peer Reviewed:||Yes||HERDC Category Description:||C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal||Statistics to Oct 2018:||Visitors: 231
|Appears in Collections:||Journal Article|
Files in This Item:
checked on Nov 26, 2018
checked on Jan 12, 2019
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.