Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/16039
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lawrence, Robert John | en |
dc.contributor.author | Rowe, James | en |
dc.contributor.author | Bird, Simon | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-11-12T16:20:00Z | - |
dc.date.created | 1998 | en |
dc.date.issued | 1999 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/16039 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The Australian feedlot industry has sufficient capacity to feed approximately 870 000 head (ALFA Lotfeeding 1997) and contributes approximately 25% of total beef production in Australia. The industry is composed of feedlots incorporated into vertically integrated companies, custom feedlots, pastoral operations and opportunity feedlots. Custom feedlots feed and market cattle for other owners, the pastoral operations value add and retain control over breeding programmes and opportunity feedlots feed cattle on a opportunistic basis when market conditions, eg. feed costs, cattle costs and selling price, are economically beneficial. | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.title | A comparison of bunk management strategies and their effect on cattle performance and health | en |
dc.type | Thesis Masters Research | en |
dcterms.accessRights | UNE Green | en |
local.contributor.firstname | Robert John | en |
local.contributor.firstname | James | en |
local.contributor.firstname | Simon | en |
dcterms.RightsStatement | Copyright 1998 - Robert John Lawrence | en |
dc.date.conferred | 1999 | en |
local.thesis.degreelevel | Masters research | en |
local.thesis.degreename | Master of Rural Science | en |
local.contributor.grantor | University of New England | en |
local.profile.school | School of Environmental and Rural Science | en |
local.profile.email | jrowe@une.edu.au | en |
local.output.category | T1 | en |
local.record.place | au | en |
local.record.institution | University of New England | en |
local.identifier.epublicationsrecord | vtls008619494 | en |
local.access.fulltext | Yes | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Lawrence | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Rowe | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Bird | en |
dc.identifier.staff | une-id:jrowe | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.profile.role | supervisor | en |
local.profile.role | supervisor | en |
local.identifier.unepublicationid | une:16276 | en |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
local.title.maintitle | A comparison of bunk management strategies and their effect on cattle performance and health | en |
local.output.categorydescription | T1 Thesis - Masters Degree by Research | en |
local.thesis.borndigital | no | en |
local.search.author | Lawrence, Robert John | en |
local.search.supervisor | Rowe, James | en |
local.search.supervisor | Bird, Simon | en |
local.open.fileurl | https://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/4e6eb4bd-f1f1-4e78-9c97-843967188efd | en |
local.open.fileurl | https://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/26dc1bdb-9e1f-4aeb-beea-b4072849e083 | en |
local.open.fileurl | https://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/faa5f5fd-631c-4906-84bc-3db0c4100bc1 | en |
local.open.fileurl | https://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/901227a5-c562-431d-9560-f7479580cda8 | en |
local.open.fileurl | https://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/f4526fcd-7ba8-48b4-a91d-2eb6888d13d4 | en |
local.uneassociation | Yes | en |
local.year.conferred | 1999 | en |
local.fileurl.open | https://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/901227a5-c562-431d-9560-f7479580cda8 | en |
local.fileurl.open | https://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/faa5f5fd-631c-4906-84bc-3db0c4100bc1 | en |
local.fileurl.open | https://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/26dc1bdb-9e1f-4aeb-beea-b4072849e083 | en |
local.fileurl.open | https://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/f4526fcd-7ba8-48b4-a91d-2eb6888d13d4 | en |
local.fileurl.open | https://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/4e6eb4bd-f1f1-4e78-9c97-843967188efd | en |
Appears in Collections: | Thesis Masters Research |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
open/SOURCE05.pdf | Thesis, part 2 | 2.49 MB | Adobe PDF Download Adobe | View/Open |
open/SOURCE06.pdf | Thesis, part 3 | 1.12 MB | Adobe PDF Download Adobe | View/Open |
open/SOURCE03.pdf | Abstract | 455.18 kB | Adobe PDF Download Adobe | View/Open |
open/SOURCE07.pdf | Thesis, part 4 | 1.23 MB | Adobe PDF Download Adobe | View/Open |
open/SOURCE04.pdf | Thesis, part 1 | 3.8 MB | Adobe PDF Download Adobe | View/Open |
Page view(s)
2,972
checked on May 19, 2024
Download(s)
890
checked on May 19, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.