Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/15933
Title: The effect of low energy electric shock on cortisol, β-endorphin, heart rate and behaviour of cattle
Contributor(s): Lee, Caroline  (author); Fisher, Andrew (author); Reed, Matt T (author); Henshall, John M (author)
Publication Date: 2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.10.002
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/15933
Abstract: Electrical stimuli are used increasingly to confine cattle, whether through conventional electric fencing or the development of 'virtual' fencing systems. Two experiments were conducted to assess behavioural, heart rate and stress hormone responses of cattle to electrical stimuli typically used in such confinement applications. In the first experiment, 30 steers (18-months old; n = 10 per treatment) were held in a handling crush for 15 min after receiving one of the following treatments: nothing (control); delivery of three shocks at 2 s intervals (600 V, 250 mW); and restraint in a head bail for 3 min. Plasma cortisol and β-endorphin concentrations were measured at 0, 5, 10, 15 min, 1, 2, 3, and 4 h. In a second experiment, heart rate and behaviour were measured in 17 heifers (18 months of age) subjected to one of the following treatments whilst held in a crush for 10 min: nothing (control; n = 5); delivery of three shocks at 2 s intervals (600 V, 250 mW; n = 6); and restraint in a head bail for 3 min (n = 6). Cortisol and β-endorphin concentrations did not differ between treatments (P 0.05). Whilst animals were receiving the treatments, heart rate was lower when head restrained compared with shock or control treatments (P = 0.009) and did not differ between control and electric shock treatments (P = 0.35). Upon release from the crush, heart rate was higher in shock and head restrained treatments than the control treatment (P = 0.005). Animals receiving the electric shock treatment tossed their heads more frequently whilst in the crush than control animals (P = 0.012) but did not differ from the other treatments in the number of vocalisations, tail swishes, steps back and forward, head tilts and head turns. There was a significant effect of treatment on flight time (P = 0.005); animals receiving the electric shocks were faster to leave the crush than control animals (P = 0.005) and there was no difference between head restraint and shock treatment (P = 0.86). In 10 min following release from the crush, there was no treatment difference in the time to start feeding. This study suggests that the stress response of cattle to low energy electric shocks is minimal and is similar to that induced by restraint in a crush.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 113(1-3), p. 32-42
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Place of Publication: Netherlands
ISSN: 1872-9045
0168-1591
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 070207 Humane Animal Treatment
070202 Animal Growth and Development
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 830302 Dairy Cattle
830301 Beef Cattle
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

30
checked on Mar 23, 2024

Page view(s)

1,148
checked on Mar 24, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.