Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/15585
Title: Spatial variability in pH and key soil nutrients: is this an opportunity to increase fertiliser and lime-use efficiency in grazing systems?
Contributor(s): Trotter, Mark  (author); Guppy, Christopher  (author)orcid ; Haling, Rebecca  (author); Trotter, Tieneke  (author); Edwards, Clare (author); Lamb, David  (author)
Publication Date: 2014
DOI: 10.1071/CP13449
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/15585
Abstract: Nutrient-use efficiency is a key issue for grazing systems in Australia. Spatial variability in soil pH and nutrients at the sub-paddock scale may affect the efficiency of utilisation of, and provide an opportunity for, site-specific management (SSM) of fertiliser and soil ameliorants. However, there has been little research exploring the potential for SSM in grazing systems. This study examines the spatial variability of soil test pH, phosphorus (P), potassium (K) and sulfur(S) in two typical pasture fields (a native and an improved) on the Northern Tablelands of New South Wales and evaluates the potential for SSM based on a comparison with critical values. In both fields, the overall paddock mean from a grid survey containing >80 samples for pH, P, K and S (0-10 cm) exceeded the critical values, suggesting that the addition of fertiliser or lime was not required. However, considerable sub-paddock-scale variability was observed, with CV ranging from 35% to 66% for the key nutrients (P, K and S). The Sprengel-Liebig Law of the Minimum was applied to evaluate the proportion of each field constrained by one or more soil characteristics. Up to 55% of the improved paddock and 78% of the native pasture was potentially responsive to amendments. The results of this study suggest that SSM of fertilisers and ameliorants could provide substantial improvements in productivity and possibly reductions in fertiliser use. The development and application of appropriate systems and tools to effectively quantify this spatial variability remain a challenge, coupled with management strategies that optimise the placement of amendments and account for the variability in other production limiting factors.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Crop and Pasture Science, 65(8), p. 817-827
Publisher: CSIRO Publishing
Place of Publication: Australia
ISSN: 1836-5795
1836-0947
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 070104 Agricultural Spatial Analysis and Modelling
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 300206 Agricultural spatial analysis and modelling
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 830406 Sown Pastures (excl. Lucerne)
830403 Native and Residual Pastures
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 100505 Sown pastures (excl. lucerne)
100503 Native and residual pastures
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

22
checked on Aug 17, 2024

Page view(s)

2,006
checked on Apr 28, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.