Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/15585
Title: | Spatial variability in pH and key soil nutrients: is this an opportunity to increase fertiliser and lime-use efficiency in grazing systems? | Contributor(s): | Trotter, Mark (author); Guppy, Christopher (author) ; Haling, Rebecca (author); Trotter, Tieneke (author); Edwards, Clare (author); Lamb, David (author) | Publication Date: | 2014 | DOI: | 10.1071/CP13449 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/15585 | Abstract: | Nutrient-use efficiency is a key issue for grazing systems in Australia. Spatial variability in soil pH and nutrients at the sub-paddock scale may affect the efficiency of utilisation of, and provide an opportunity for, site-specific management (SSM) of fertiliser and soil ameliorants. However, there has been little research exploring the potential for SSM in grazing systems. This study examines the spatial variability of soil test pH, phosphorus (P), potassium (K) and sulfur(S) in two typical pasture fields (a native and an improved) on the Northern Tablelands of New South Wales and evaluates the potential for SSM based on a comparison with critical values. In both fields, the overall paddock mean from a grid survey containing >80 samples for pH, P, K and S (0-10 cm) exceeded the critical values, suggesting that the addition of fertiliser or lime was not required. However, considerable sub-paddock-scale variability was observed, with CV ranging from 35% to 66% for the key nutrients (P, K and S). The Sprengel-Liebig Law of the Minimum was applied to evaluate the proportion of each field constrained by one or more soil characteristics. Up to 55% of the improved paddock and 78% of the native pasture was potentially responsive to amendments. The results of this study suggest that SSM of fertilisers and ameliorants could provide substantial improvements in productivity and possibly reductions in fertiliser use. The development and application of appropriate systems and tools to effectively quantify this spatial variability remain a challenge, coupled with management strategies that optimise the placement of amendments and account for the variability in other production limiting factors. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Crop and Pasture Science, 65(8), p. 817-827 | Publisher: | CSIRO Publishing | Place of Publication: | Australia | ISSN: | 1836-5795 1836-0947 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 070104 Agricultural Spatial Analysis and Modelling | Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 300206 Agricultural spatial analysis and modelling | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 830406 Sown Pastures (excl. Lucerne) 830403 Native and Residual Pastures |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 100505 Sown pastures (excl. lucerne) 100503 Native and residual pastures |
Peer Reviewed: | Yes | HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Environmental and Rural Science |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format |
---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
22
checked on Aug 17, 2024
Page view(s)
2,006
checked on Apr 28, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.