Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/15516
Title: Pro-poor development performance of livestock projects: Analysis and lessons from projects' documentation
Contributor(s): Wanyoike, Francis (author); Baker, Derek  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2013
DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2013.811470
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/15516
Abstract: The importance of livestock as a pathway out of poverty is widely recognised, but the effectiveness of pro-poor livestock development projects has been questioned. This study examines a sample of livestock development projects to draw lessons about their effectiveness and identify best practice. A large proportion of projects (60 per cent) were categorised as having not been successful. Project success is found to be positively associated with size of project, diversity of direct project beneficiaries, institution development activities in projects, and effective monitoring and evaluation activities. Lack of reliability of government partners, and inclusion of other agricultural activities together with livestock activities in projects, undermine success.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Development in Practice, 23(7), p. 889-907
Publisher: Routledge
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 1364-9213
0961-4524
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 140201 Agricultural Economics
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 380101 Agricultural economics
440407 Socio-economic development
300208 Farm management, rural management and agribusiness
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 910205 Industry Policy
910599 Measurement Standards and Calibration Services not elsewhere classified
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 150505 Industry policy
280101 Expanding knowledge in the agricultural, food and veterinary sciences
280108 Expanding knowledge in economics
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Mar 23, 2024

Page view(s)

1,316
checked on Apr 14, 2024

Download(s)

4
checked on Apr 14, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.