Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||The ethics and politics of ethics approval||Contributor(s):||Battin, Tim (author) ; Riley, Daniel (author); Avery, Alan (author)||Publication Date:||2014||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/14919||Abstract:||The regulatory scope of Human Research Ethics Committees can be problematic for a variety of reasons. Some scholars have argued the ethics approval process, for example, is antithetical to certain disciplines in the humanities and social sciences, while others are willing to give it qualified support. This article uses a case study to cast the debate about how to address the weaknesses in ethics approval processes into the context of an ever-increasing level of managerialist interference in the work carried out by researchers. The problems attached to the former are unlikely to be resolved, while the latter is allowed to continue.||Publication Type:||Journal Article||Source of Publication:||Australian Universities' Review, 56(1), p. 4-12||Publisher:||National Tertiary Education Union||Place of Publication:||Australia||ISSN:||0818-8068||Field of Research (FOR):||130103 Higher Education||Peer Reviewed:||Yes||HERDC Category Description:||C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal||Other Links:||http://www.aur.org.au/archive||Statistics to Oct 2018:||Visitors: 283
|Appears in Collections:||Journal Article|
School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
UNE Business School
Files in This Item:
checked on Dec 29, 2018
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.