Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/14800
Title: Education policy enactment research: disrupting continuities
Contributor(s): Heimans, Stephen  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2014
DOI: 10.1080/01596306.2013.832566
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/14800
Abstract: The work in the book 'How Schools Do Policy: Policy Enactments in Secondary Schools' is important, interesting and necessary. It carries on a tradition of policy critique that in the main makes careful and judicious use of Foucauldian scholarship that has opened, and continues to open, the way for many researchers in critical policy sociology. However, there are several cautions to be made, that I will come to shortly. The book under review proposes new theory and research possibilities that will, and are already, moving the field of education policy studies in fruitful and interesting directions. I think it makes important steps forward for researchers interested and involved in investigating education policy enactment. It establishes a firm ground from which to think through the complexity of what happens with policy in schools, away from the potential monolithic nature of understandings that inhere in most studies of policy implementation, particularly in the US tradition of policy studies. 'Enactment' seeks complexity and nuance and multidirectionality (as opposed to the unidirectionality implied in 'implementation'), and this is captured especially in some of the tentative, open and complex writing in the book. The title also signals an important conceptual shift to 'doing' policy and this moves attention for research away from the substance of policy (isolating its textual or semiotic features, for example) itself to the practices in which policy becomes implicated and to which it contributes (however positively or negatively this may occur). This move in itself has large methodological and theoretical implications. Theoretically this potentially opens up policy research: moving it from being about knowing what policy is, as a quite static object that becomes open to interpretational or analytic hermeneutic approaches aimed at discovering the contents of policy, to something that is more concerned with the messiness and unpredictability of what people do.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(2), p. 307-316
Publisher: Routledge
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 1469-3739
0159-6306
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 139999 Education not elsewhere classified
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 399999 Other education not elsewhere classified
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 939999 Education and Training not elsewhere classified
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 169999 Other education and training not elsewhere classified
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Education

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
checked on Nov 11, 2023

Page view(s)

1,278
checked on Nov 19, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.