Comparisons of Identical by State and Identical by Descent Relationship Matrices Derived from SNP Markers in Genomic Evaluation

Title
Comparisons of Identical by State and Identical by Descent Relationship Matrices Derived from SNP Markers in Genomic Evaluation
Publication Date
2013
Author(s)
Clark, Sam A
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8605-1738
Email: sclark37@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:sclark37
Kinghorn, Brian
Van Der Werf, Julius H
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2512-1696
Email: jvanderw@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:jvanderw
Editor
Editor(s): Nicolas Lopez Villalobos
Type of document
Conference Publication
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics (AAABG)
Place of publication
Armidale, Australia
UNE publication id
une:14692
Abstract
In animal populations, family members inherit alleles through common ancestors and these shared regions are referred to as identical by descent (IBD). Furthermore, animals may also share alleles due to a random association with no known common inheritance pattern. This identity by state (IBS) also covers known relationships, such that regions that are IBD are also IBS, however regions that are IBS may not always be IBD. In the genetic evaluation of livestock, IBD and IBS information can be used to build the genomic relationship matrix (GRM) and breeding values can be predicted using genomic best linear unbiased prediction (gBLUP). This study compares a number of different methods to construct the GRM, using IBD and IBS information. Each method was evaluated using a reference dataset of 1781 Merino sheep and validated using 164 progeny tested sires that had accurate breeding values. Estimates of variance components were also compared. There was no significant difference between the accuracy achieved by the IBS and IBD methods. However the accuracy of the EBVs decreased as a greater restriction was applied to whether a region was IBD or not IBD. Furthermore, estimates of variance components were substantially different for IBD and IBS methods.
Link
Citation
Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics, v.20, p. 261-265
ISSN
1328-3227
ISBN
9780473260569
Start page
261
End page
265

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink