Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/14396
Title: | Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in 'Bos taurus', 'Bos indicus', and composite beef cattle | Contributor(s): | Bolormaa, S (author); Pryce, J E (author); Harrison, B E (author); Reverter, A (author); Herd, Robert M (author) ; Tier, Bruce (author); Graser, Hans-Ulrich (author); Goddard, M E (author); Kemper, K (author); Savin, S (author); Hayes, B J (author); Barendse, W (author); Zhang, Yuandan (author) ; Reich, C M (author); Mason, B A (author); Bunch, R J (author) | Publication Date: | 2013 | Open Access: | Yes | DOI: | 10.2527/jas.2012-5827 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/14396 | Abstract: | The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of genomic predictions for 19 traits including feed efficiency, growth, and carcass and meat quality traits in beef cattle. The 10,181 cattle in our study had real or imputed genotypes for 729,068 SNP although not all cattle were measured for all traits. Animals included 'Bos taurus', Brahman, composite, and crossbred animals. Genomic EBV (GEBV) were calculated using 2 methods of genomic prediction [BayesR and genomic BLUP (GBLUP)] either using a common training dataset for all breeds or using a training dataset comprising only animals of the same breed. Accuracies of GEBV were assessed using 5-fold cross-validation. The accuracy of genomic prediction varied by trait and by method. Traits with a large number of recorded and genotyped animals and with high heritability gave the greatest accuracy of GEBV. Using GBLUP, the average accuracy was 0.27 across traits and breeds, but the accuracies between breeds and between traits varied widely. When the training population was restricted to animals from the same breed as the validation population, GBLUP accuracies declined by an average of 0.04. The greatest decline in accuracy was found for the 4 composite breeds. The BayesR accuracies were greater by an average of 0.03 than GBLUP accuracies, particularly for traits with known genes of moderate to large effect mutations segregating. The accuracies of 0.43 to 0.48 for IGF-I traits were among the greatest in the study. Although accuracies are low compared with those observed in dairy cattle, genomic selection would still be beneficial for traits that are hard to improve by conventional selection, such as tenderness and residual feed intake. BayesR identified many of the same quantitative trait loci as a genomewide association study but appeared to map them more precisely. All traits appear to be highly polygenic with thousands of SNP independently associated with each trait. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Journal of Animal Science, 91(7), p. 3088-3104 | Publisher: | American Society of Animal Science | Place of Publication: | United States of America | ISSN: | 1525-3163 0021-8812 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 060408 Genomics 070201 Animal Breeding |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 310509 Genomics 300305 Animal reproduction and breeding |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 830301 Beef Cattle | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 100401 Beef cattle | Peer Reviewed: | Yes | HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal | Publisher/associated links: | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23658330 |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit (AGBU) Journal Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format |
---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
140
checked on Nov 30, 2024
Page view(s)
2,244
checked on Jul 23, 2023
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.