Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/13983
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWalsh, Adrian Jen
local.source.editorEditor(s): Hugh LaFolletteen
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-12T11:54:00Z
dc.date.issued2013en
dc.identifier.citationThe International Encyclopedia of Ethics, p. 5142-5150en
dc.identifier.isbn9781444367072en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/13983en
dc.description.abstractThought experiments have been part of the philosopher's toolkit when exploring ethical issues since the very beginnings of philosophy. One need only look to Book 1 of Plato's 'Republic' to find a telling example of a thought experiment at work. Therein Plato asks us, in order to focus our attention on the problem of what reasons there are for acting morally, to imagine a ring that enables its wearer to become invisible and thereby to perpetrate all sorts of mischief. This is but one of many instances of their use to be found in the ethics literature. Some of the more famous recent examples of thought experiments in ethics, which vary widely with respect to their realism, include Philippa Foot's notorious "trolley problem," Bernard Williams' story of Jim and the Indians, and Judith Jarvis Thomson's "famous violinist" (Foot 1978; Smart and Williams 1973; Thomson 1971). However, for many newcomers to philosophical ethics the use of such stories, which often involve highly bizarre and implausible scenarios, is disconcerting. Why do philosophers, in the pursuit of ethical truth, make use of what are often fanciful stories? In this essay, we shall explore the use of thought experiments in ethics and attempt to provide some justifications for their use. What role do they play in ethical reasoning? How might it be that an imaginary tale can illuminate philosophical issues? We shall also consider a number of objections to the central role that they play in much moral theorizing. Unsurprisingly, there are many philosophers who object to their use; some have argued that they are misleading because of either the under-description required or the generalization they encourage. Others have objected that many of these thought experiments are immoral since they require us to imagine scenarios that should not be contemplated.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden
dc.relation.ispartofThe International Encyclopedia of Ethicsen
dc.relation.isversionof1en
dc.titleThought Experiments in Ethicsen
dc.typeEntry In Reference Worken
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee764en
dc.subject.keywordsSocial Philosophyen
dc.subject.keywordsEthical Theoryen
local.contributor.firstnameAdrian Jen
local.subject.for2008220305 Ethical Theoryen
local.subject.for2008220319 Social Philosophyen
local.subject.seo2008970122 Expanding Knowledge in Philosophy and Religious Studiesen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciencesen
local.profile.emailawalsh@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryNen
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20140120-221016en
local.publisher.placeonlineen
local.format.startpage5142en
local.format.endpage5150en
local.contributor.lastnameWalshen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:awalshen
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-1959-254Xen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:14196en
local.identifier.handlehttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/13983en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleThought Experiments in Ethicsen
local.output.categorydescriptionN Entry In Reference Worken
local.description.statisticsepubsVisitors: 205<br />Views: 206<br />Downloads: 0en
Appears in Collections:Entry In Reference Work
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

100
checked on Feb 16, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

 

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

 

Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.