Evolutionarily stable strategies: how common are they?

Title
Evolutionarily stable strategies: how common are they?
Publication Date
2013
Author(s)
Rohde, Klaus
Editor
Editor(s): Klaus Rohde
Type of document
Book Chapter
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Place of publication
Cambridge, United Kingdom
Edition
1
DOI
10.1017/CBO9781139095075.035
UNE publication id
une:13902
Abstract
Here we return to the question asked in the Introduction to this book: how common are evolutionarily stable strategies and states? These two concepts were developed in the context of games theory. Games theory was developed by von Neumann and Morgenstern (1944), although the French mathematician Cournot (1838) studied some aspects, further developed by Nash (1950). Its most important contribution to evolutionary biology is the concept of the evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS). It is central to modern evolutionary ecology, and Dawkins (1976) suggests that it may be "one of the most important advances in evolutionary theory since Darwin". It was introduced into ecology by Maynard Smith and Price (1973), and can be derived from the concept of the Nash Equilibrium (Nash, 1950), according to which none of a number of players in a game can gain by changing her/his strategy unilaterally. Maynard Smith (1982) gave a detailed account of applications of game theory to evolutionary theory, including ESS. However, parts of his book rely heavily on mathematics. Dawkins's (1976) 'The Selfish Gene' contains a discussion of ESS and many examples, clearly explained without any mathematics. A recent detailed review of applications of game theory and ESS to social behavior was given by McNamara and Weissing (2010).
Link
Citation
The Balance of Nature and Human Impact, p. 385-391
ISBN
9781107019614
9781139095075
Start page
385
End page
391

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink