Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/13663
Title: Estimating the ability of birds to sustain additional human-caused mortalities using a simple decision rule and allometric relationships
Contributor(s): Dillingham, Peter  (author); Fletcher, David (author)
Publication Date: 2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.04.022
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/13663
Abstract: Many bird species are subject to human-caused mortality, either through direct harvest (e.g. game birds) or through incidental mortalities (e.g. fisheries-related bycatch of seabirds, impact with vehicles, wind turbines, or power lines). In order to assess the impact of additional mortalities on birds, both the number of birds killed and their ability to sustain those deaths must be estimated. Niel and Lebreton [Niel, C., Lebreton, J.-D., 2005. Using demographic invariants to detect overharvested bird populations from incomplete data. Conservation Biology 19, 826-835] applied a simple decision rule [Wade, P.R., 1998. Calculating limits to the allowable human-caused mortality of cetaceans and pinnipeds. Marine Mammal Science 14, 1-37] to estimate the level of additional human-caused mortality or potential biological removal (PBR) that can be sustained for bird species given only (1) estimates of the population size, adult survival, and age at first breeding, and (2) the current population status and management goals. We provide guidelines for appropriate use of the method and case studies comparing results from this method to other approaches. Particular focus is placed on applying the method to Procellariiformes. PBR limits may then be set without a population model and when monitoring levels are minimal, and in a computationally straightforward manner. While this approach has many advantages, there are limitations. The PBR rule was initially developed for cetaceans and pinnipeds and there have been no adaptations for the unique biology of birds which may need further consideration. Additionally, because this is a simplifying method that ignores differences in life stages, it may not be appropriate for very small populations or for those listed as 'critically endangered', and further work is needed for situations where mortalities have large gender or age bias.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Biological Conservation, 141(7), p. 1783-1792
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Place of Publication: The Netherlands
ISSN: 1873-2917
0006-3207
Field of Research (FOR): 050205 Environmental Management
010401 Applied Statistics
060207 Population Ecology
Socio-Economic Outcome Codes: 960507 Ecosystem Assessment and Management of Marine Environments
960501 Ecosystem Assessment and Management at Regional or Larger Scales
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 130
Views: 175
Downloads: 0
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

50
checked on Nov 30, 2018

Page view(s)

12
checked on Mar 2, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.