Behavioral Consistency, the Homology Assumption, and the Problems of Induction

Title
Behavioral Consistency, the Homology Assumption, and the Problems of Induction
Publication Date
2014
Author(s)
Petherick, Wayne
Ferguson, Claire
Editor
Editor(s): Wayne Petherick
Type of document
Book Chapter
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Anderson
Place of publication
Cincinnati, United States of America
Edition
3
UNE publication id
une:13700
Abstract
The ultimate goal of profiling is to identify the major behavioral and personality characteristics to narrow the suspect pool. Inferences about offender characteristics can be accomplished deductively, based on the analysis of discrete offender behaviors established within a particular case. They can also be accomplished inductively, involving prediction based on abstract offender averages from group data (these methods and the logic on which they are based is detailed extensively in Chapters 2 and 4). As discussed, these two approaches are by no means equal. The reliability and validity of inductive profiling rest almost exclusively on two weak theories: behavioral consistency and the homology assumption. Behavioral consistency posits that the same offender will do the same thing across the span of time during different offenses. The homology assumption suggests that, generally, there will be a similarity between different offenders who commit similar crimes. Without either of these theories, comparing the current offender(s) to past offenders is essentially futile.
Link
Citation
Profiling and Serial Crime: Theoretical and Practical Issues, p. 37-61
ISBN
9780124059016
9781455731749
Start page
37
End page
61

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink