Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Legal Regulation of Genital 'Normalising' Surgery on Intersex Children||Contributor(s):||Kennedy, Aileen (author)||Publication Date:||2013||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/13197||Abstract:||'Intersex' is an umbrella term used to describe a range of conditions whereby a person may have the biological attributes of both sexes or lack some of the biological attributes considered necessary to be defined as one or the other sex. A percentage of intersex people are born with genitals which are 'ambiguous' - which cannot be clearly assigned as male or female. From the 1950s until the mid 1990s, the medical treatment protocol for intersex which produced ambiguous genitalia was to perform surgery before the child was 2 years old, in order to make the genitals appear more unambiguously male or female. Current treatment protocols continue to recommend genital 'normalising' surgery, though with less enthusiasm and more caution. In 'Marion's Case' in 1993 the High Court established a category of special medical treatment for children which only a court can authorise. Special medical treatment has not been exhaustively defined, but the factors which the court considered significant in 'Marion's Case' were that the procedure was invasive and irreversible; that there was a significant risk of making the wrong decision; and the consequences of a wrong decision would be grave and serious. Family Court-issued guidelines also state that ethically sensitive or disputed procedures should be authorised by a court. This paper will argue that genital normalising surgery on intersex children should not be performed without court authorisation. Since 1993 there have been 4 applications to the Family Court for special medical treatment of intersex children but none of these applications relate to genital normalising surgery. This paper discusses possible reasons for this absence and argues that such surgery has been and may continue to be performed without proper legal authority.||Publication Type:||Conference Publication||Conference Details:||Australasian Association of Bioethics & Health Law (AABHL) Conference: Pivotal Moments/Future Horizons - Continuity and Change in Australasian Bioethics, Sydney, Australia, 11th - 14th July, 2013||Source of Publication:||Australasian Association of Bioethics & Health Law Conference Program||Publisher:||Conference Design Pty Ltd||Place of Publication:||Hobart, Australia||Field of Research (FOR):||180199 Law not elsewhere classified||Socio-Economic Objective (SEO):||940499 Justice and the Law not elsewhere classified||HERDC Category Description:||E3 Extract of Scholarly Conference Publication||Other Links:||http://www.conferencedesign.com.au/aabhl2013/program.html||Statistics to Oct 2018:||Visitors: 172
|Appears in Collections:||Conference Publication|
School of Law
Files in This Item:
checked on May 3, 2019
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.