Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/1295
Title: Rhetorical Patterns in the Australian Debate over War with Iraq
Contributor(s): Dollery, Brian Edward (author); Crase, L (author)
Publication Date: 2003
DOI: 10.1080/0810902032000113497
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/1295
Abstract: Considerable public debate surrounded the Bush Administration's policy to invade Iraq if it did not dismantle its purported stockpile of 'Weapons of Mass Destruction' and the wisdom of Australian participation in such an attack. This paper invokes Albert Hirschman's well-known 'rhetoric of reaction' taxonomy to examine the patterns of persuasive discourse embodied in the Australian debate over the desirability of Australian involvement in a war with Iraq. We seek to establish whether the Hirschmanian typology does indeed adequately describe rhetorical patterns in the Australian debate and we attempt to identify shortcomings in the analytical system proposed by Hirschman.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Prometheus, 21(3), p. 355-363
Publisher: Routledge
Place of Publication: Abingdon, United Kingdom
ISSN: 0810-9028
1470-1030
Field of Research (FOR): 140218 Urban and Regional Economics
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 103
Views: 103
Downloads: 0
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
UNE Business School

Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on Nov 26, 2018

Page view(s)

136
checked on Mar 2, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

 

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

 

Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.