Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/12916
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPurushothaman, Dharmaen
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Wendyen
dc.contributor.authorWu, Shubiaoen
dc.contributor.authorVanselow, Barbaraen
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-08T15:11:00Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationAustralasian Medical Journal, 5(12), p. 706-707en
dc.identifier.issn1836-1935en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/12916-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Use of computed tomography (CT) in canine obesity research is limited and accuracy of estimated fat is still questioned. Using latest image analysis programs, previous studies in sheep showed a significant correlation between CT-derived and hot carcass measurements. Hence we tested the method in canine research. Objective: To develop an improved research method to estimate body composition including total body fat, lean tissue and bone in two morphologically diverse breeds of dogs. Design: A whole body scan was performed twice (four weeks apart) on six beagles and six greyhounds using Picker UltraZ 2000 CT scanner. They were sedated to the prone position with fore/hind limbs pointing forward and tails tucked in. The individual CT images were taken at 10 mm interval and edited using latest software (OSIRIX) in diacom format to remove extraneous objects within the image. Images were then converted from 16 bit CT image to 8 bit binary image using Image J and rescaled to 256 greyscales using AutoCAT. Boundaries for fat, lean and bone were set to the scales of 20-130, 131-220, and 221-255 respectively. The AutoCAT program then computed the total weight of fat, lean and bone for each dog. CT-derived total body weight was calculated from the sum of fat, lean and bone. Percentages of fat, lean and bone were also calculated. Pearson correlation analysis between CT-derived and measured total body weight were performed separately in two breeds for two scans (CT1, CT2). Significant differences of fat% between breeds were determined using paired t-test. Outcomes: When CT-derived total body weight was compared with measured total bodyweight, both beagles and greyhounds showed a significant correlation (R²=0.99; P=0.000) for both scans. The method also detected a significant breed difference (P=0.000) in the mean fat% for both scans. Conclusion: The proposed method using latest image analysis software programs showed significant correlation between CT-derived and measured total body weight for both the breeds, and the results were reproducible in two scans. The body compositions of different breeds measured by the CT scan were significantly different. Future studies should compare the proposed method with other existing methods used for detecting body composition such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and deuterium oxide dilution.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherAustralasian Medical Journal Pty Ltden
dc.relation.ispartofAustralasian Medical Journalen
dc.titleEstimating total body fat using computed tomography in two dog breedsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.subject.keywordsAnimal Managementen
dc.subject.keywordsAnimal Growth and Developmenten
dc.subject.keywordsVeterinary Diagnosis and Diagnosticsen
local.contributor.firstnameDharmaen
local.contributor.firstnameWendyen
local.contributor.firstnameShubiaoen
local.contributor.firstnameBarbaraen
local.subject.for2008070203 Animal Managementen
local.subject.for2008070202 Animal Growth and Developmenten
local.subject.for2008070703 Veterinary Diagnosis and Diagnosticsen
local.subject.seo2008839999 Animal Production and Animal Primary Products not elsewhere classifieden
local.profile.schoolRSA School Establishment Positionsen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emaildpurusho@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailwbrown@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailswu3@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailbvansel2@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC4en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20130419-090548en
local.publisher.placeAustraliaen
local.format.startpage706en
local.format.endpage707en
local.identifier.volume5en
local.identifier.issue12en
local.contributor.lastnamePurushothamanen
local.contributor.lastnameBrownen
local.contributor.lastnameWuen
local.contributor.lastnameVanselowen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:dpurushoen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:wbrownen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:swu3en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:bvansel2en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-5309-3381en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-1790-6015en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:13124en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleEstimating total body fat using computed tomography in two dog breedsen
local.output.categorydescriptionC4 Letter of Noteen
local.search.authorPurushothaman, Dharmaen
local.search.authorBrown, Wendyen
local.search.authorWu, Shubiaoen
local.search.authorVanselow, Barbaraen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2012en
local.subject.for2020300302 Animal managementen
local.subject.for2020300301 Animal growth and developmenten
local.subject.for2020300904 Veterinary diagnosis and diagnosticsen
local.subject.seo2020109999 Other animal production and animal primary products not elsewhere classifieden
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,354
checked on Aug 18, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.