Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/12496
Title: Transaction costs of carbon offset projects: A comparative study
Contributor(s): Cacho, Oscar J (author)orcid ; Lipper, Leslie (author); Moss, Jonathan (author)
Publication Date: 2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.008
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/12496
Abstract: The land-use change and forestry sector can be a cost-effective contributor to climate mitigation in at least three ways: providing carbon offsets through carbon sequestration in biomass and soils, reducing emissions of methane and other greenhouse gases, and producing biofuels that replace fossil fuels. The presence of carbon markets should help encourage these activities; however, most carbon trades to date have occurred in the energy sector. A major obstacle to carbon trades from land-use systems is the presence of high transaction costs of converting a carbon offset into a tradable commodity, so the prevailing market carbon prices may not provide enough incentive for adoption. This paper presents a model of the exchange of carbon offsets between a project developer and a group of landholders. The model is solved to derive project feasibility frontiers that show the minimum number of contracts necessary to make a project feasible at any given carbon price. The model is applied to two case studies (smallholder agroforestry in Indonesia and partial reforestation of family farms in Australia) under two types of contract (purchase of carbon flows and rental of carbon stocks). The paper concludes by identifying possible strategies to reduce transaction costs while maintaining project integrity.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Ecological Economics, v.88, p. 232-243
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Place of Publication: The Netherlands
ISSN: 0921-8009
1873-6106
Field of Research (FOR): 140205 Environment and Resource Economics
140201 Agricultural Economics
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 302
Views: 309
Downloads: 1
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

33
checked on Nov 30, 2018

Page view(s)

100
checked on Jan 22, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

 

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

 

Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.