Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/12471
Title: | Feather sampling provides an unreliable source of DNA that may well have significant long-term impacts: a reply to Katzner et al. | Contributor(s): | McDonald, Paul (author) ; Griffith, Simon C (author) | Publication Date: | 2012 | DOI: | 10.1111/j.1600-048X.2011.05692.x | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/12471 | Abstract: | We were pleased to see that our recent point-of-view article (McDonald and Griffith 2011) has lead to further discussion on this important issue (Katzner et al. 2012). One of our primary goals was to encourage researchers to consider both the potential impacts of their sampling methodologies upon subjects, and also the level of information that particular methods are likely to provide. Whilst we are therefore pleased that Katzner et al. (2012) have continued the discussion and helped to raise the profile of important issues surrounding the biological sampling of avian tissues, we are disappointed that they have misrepresented our original message. The primary critique raised by Katzner et al. (2012) centres on our reputed suggestion that blood sampling was a 'one-size-fits-all-approach' to ornithology. This main criticism of our article is somewhat weakened by the fact that nowhere in our article did we either state or imply this to be the case. In fact, the opposite is true, in several places in our article we explicitly suggested that feather sampling may well be the best practise in some situations. The clearest statement to this effect is on the very first page of our article: 'Note that we support the obtainment of feather material, after applying an appropriate degree of ethical rigour, when no other means exists for obtaining these data'. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Journal of Avian Biology, 43(1), p. 18-20 | Publisher: | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd | Place of Publication: | United States of America | ISSN: | 1600-048X 0908-8857 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 060801 Animal Behaviour | Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 310901 Animal behaviour | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 970106 Expanding Knowledge in the Biological Sciences | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 280102 Expanding knowledge in the biological sciences | Peer Reviewed: | Yes | HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format |
---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
3
checked on Mar 23, 2024
Page view(s)
1,224
checked on Mar 10, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.