Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/12188
Title: Beyond the Rhetoric: The Practice of Affirmative Action in Australia
Contributor(s): Sheridan, Alison Jane (author); Gates, G Richard (supervisor)
Conferred Date: 1998
Copyright Date: 1995
Open Access: Yes
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/12188
Abstract: In 1986 the 'Affirmative Action (Equal Employment Opportunity for Women) Act' was passed by the Australian federal government to address the problem of inequality of employment opportunity for women in Australia. Equal employment opportunity was the stated goal of the legislation and affirmative action was the name given to the interventionary practices designed to achieve the goal. Organisations covered by the legislation are required to implement affirmative action programs and report to the Affirmative Action Agency annually, outlining their programs. This thesis explores the 'practice' of affirmative action from two major perspectives. The first perspective involves a description of the types of affirmative action policies that organisations covered by the legislation reported to the Affirmative Action Agency. In the absence of a descriptive typology of affirmative action policies in Australia, one was developed which distinguished among five types of affirmative action policies - 'temperamental', 'work & family', 'non-traditional', 'social structural' and 'opportunities'. This typology was then used to classify the affirmative action policies of 288 organisations with well developed affirmative action programs in place. The most commonly reported policies were 'social structural'; that is, policies seeking to ensure personnel practices within the organisations were non discriminatory. Policies which challenged the 'traditional order' within organisations (that is, 'non–traditional' and 'opportunities' policies) were less common than those primarily concerned with removing discriminatory practices. In the second part of the thesis, the 'practice' of affirmative action was examined in three organisations which were, by standards set by the Affirmative Action Agency, 'exemplary' performers in affirmative action. The focus of this part of the thesis was on how employees within these organisations perceived the affirmative action programs in place in their organisations, and their employment opportunities. The findings from interviews and subsequent surveys of employees suggest that despite the various efforts of these companies to create an environment in which women and men enjoy the same employment opportunities, the goal has yet to be fully achieved. A significant percentage of women perceived their employment opportunities to be somewhat less than those of men and that the employment processes were not 'fair'. This suggests that the promise of affirmative action has yet to be fulfilled; the practice has not matched the rhetoric. From the insights gained from employees' perceptions of affirmative action and their work environments and consideration of the pertinent literature, some strategies for enhancing the practice of affirmative action are canvassed.
Publication Type: Thesis Doctoral
Rights Statement: Copyright 1995 - Alison Jane Sheridan
HERDC Category Description: T2 Thesis - Doctorate by Research
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 258
Views: 222
Downloads: 41
Appears in Collections:Thesis Doctoral
UNE Business School

Files in This Item:
11 files
File Description SizeFormat 
open/SOURCE08.pdfSOURCE08.pdf2.87 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
open/SOURCE05.pdfSOURCE05.pdf4.4 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
open/SOURCE06.pdfSOURCE06.pdf4.45 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
open/SOURCE03.pdfSOURCE03.pdf664.4 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
open/SOURCE07.pdfSOURCE07.pdf4.56 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
open/SOURCE04.pdfSOURCE04.pdf4.53 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
1 2 Next
Show full item record

Page view(s)

172
checked on Feb 6, 2019

Download(s)

96
checked on Feb 6, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

 

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

 

Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.