Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/12039
Title: | Bearing the Brunt: Co-workers' Experiences of Work Reintegration Processes | Contributor(s): | Dunstan, Debra (author) ; MacEachen, Ellen (author) | Publication Date: | 2013 | DOI: | 10.1007/s10926-012-9380-2 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/12039 | Abstract: | Purpose: Work disability research has found co-worker support to be a significant but under-recognised aspect of work reintegration (WR) processes. Although co-workers work alongside returning workers, their practical contribution to WR success or failure is often invisible to others. This study aimed to gain further insight into the role and contribution of co-workers in WR interventions. Method An exploratory qualitative pilot study was conducted in Toronto, Canada in 2011. Three focus groups were conducted with 13 co-workers, recruited for their direct experience of 'working alongside' a returning worker. An iterative data gathering and analysis process occurred. Themes were generated from categories in open-ended interview questions and new issues arising from the data. Findings The findings detail co-workers' practical experiences of WR processes and their reflections on social and work conditions that impacted their participation. Co-workers' capacity to support returning workers was related to the quality of the WR arrangements, the relationship with the returning worker, work culture, and the duration of the required support. Workplace privacy and confidentiality requirements were identified as a key challenge for co-worker participation. The effects on co-workers of WR processes ranged from the opportunity to learn new skills to disillusionment and withdrawal from the workplace. In worst case scenarios, 'ripple effects' including emotional distress, physical injury and termination of co-workers' employment had occurred. Conclusion Co-workers are not a neutral party in WR procedures. Formalizing the co-worker role to include communication, consideration and recognition might improve co-workers' WR experiences. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 23(1), p. 44-54 | Publisher: | Springer New York LLC | Place of Publication: | United States of America | ISSN: | 1573-3688 1053-0487 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 111705 Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety | Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 350505 Occupational and workplace health and safety | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 920505 Occupational Health | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 200507 Occupational health | Peer Reviewed: | Yes | HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Psychology |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format |
---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
48
checked on Apr 6, 2024
Page view(s)
1,606
checked on Mar 24, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.