Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Multi-criterion GIS-based Assessment of Wetlands: Clarence Catchment, Australia||Contributor(s):||Liu, Canran (author); Frazier, Paul (author); Kumar, Lalit (author) ; Macgregor, Catherine Morrans (author); Blake, Nigel (author)||Publication Date:||2005||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/11594||Abstract:||The Clarence River catchment with an area of 22 700 km² is the largest coastal catchment in NSW. The catchment contains many wetlands that provide critical habitat to a great diversity of plants, invertebrates, fish, birds, and mammals. They serve as nursery grounds for many economically important fish species. But many of the wetland areas in the Clarence catchment are under threat from development. The Upper North Coast Catchment Management Board blueprint targets the identification and prioritisation of wetlands for rehabilitation as an important priority for management in the Clarence River Catchment. However, there is a lack of objective information on wetland condition or importance that could be used to inform management decisions. In this study a GIS-based wetland assessment and rehabilitation prioritization methodology was developed. 14 GIS datasets that describe: wetland location and character; protected areas; and potential threats were collated and registered to a common mapping system (UTM 56). With the aid of a wetland assessment expert these datasets were processed to create 16 wetland assessment variables. The wetland expert then provided a weighting for each variable according to the direction and magnitude of the likely influence it may have on wetland condition. For example the wetlands that fall under RAMSAR protection were weighted as highly protected, while wetlands that were heavily affected by hydrological modification were weig hted as highly vulnerable. Finally, a multi-criterion decision-making method, TOPSIS (the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) was used to integrate the variables, ranking the wetlands according to their distance from both the worst condition and the best condition. Once the TOPSIS program was constructed a number of scenarios were run to appraise the condition of each wetland and determine the priority for rehabilitation. To assess the robustness of the method a sensitivity analysis was conducted comparing the result of different weightings, distance measures and normalization techniques. The results of this analysis show that the method is robust even though parameters like variable weightings are necessarily subjective. It is concluded that the methodology developed in this study is a fast, cost-effective, and flexible wetland assessment and prioritization approach. It provides a screening tool to help prioritize wetlands for further investigation.||Publication Type:||Conference Publication||Conference Name:||SSC 2005: 2nd national biennial Conference of the Spatial Sciences Institute - Spatial Intelligence, Innovation and Praxis, Melbourne, Australia, 12th - 16th September, 2005||Source of Publication:||Spatial Sciences Institute National Biennial Conference (SSC 2005) Final Program and Abstract Book, p. 89-89||Publisher:||Spatial Sciences Institute||Place of Publication:||Melbourne, Australia||Field of Research (FOR):||050205 Environmental Management||HERDC Category Description:||E3 Extract of Scholarly Conference Publication||Statistics to Oct 2018:||Visitors: 232
|Appears in Collections:||Conference Publication|
Files in This Item:
checked on Mar 26, 2019
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.