Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/11393
Title: Sex, Bodily Harm and Consent: A Dworkinian Approach
Contributor(s): Marinac, Anthony Schuyler (author); Ghosh, Eric (supervisor); Hogg, Russell (supervisor)
Conferred Date: 2012
Copyright Date: 2012
Open Access: Yes
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/11393
Abstract: In 'R v Brown', the House of Lords decided that the consent of the victim is no defence to a charge of actual or grievous bodily harm inflicted during sadomasochistic sex. The same question has never been brought before an Australian court, but textbook writers regularly defer to 'R v Brown' on this point. This thesis considers whether 'R v Brown' should be followed in Australia. Academic debate since 'R v Brown' has largely been based on three separate legal philosophies: liberalism, which holds that a consent defence should be allowed; critical feminism, which argues that consent should not be allowed because sadomasochistic sex may just be another form of sexualised abuse of women; and conservative paternalism, which argues that consent should not be allowed because sadomasochistic sex provides no benefit, and much harm, to society and its values (and to the participants). This thesis treats 'R v Brown' as a hard case, in which neither statute nor precedent provides adequate guidance. Dworkin has proposed a method for resolving such cases, by considering the principles which underlie an area of law, and ruling in a manner consistent with those principles. Following this process, this thesis posits a hypothetical court, and invites three advocates - a liberal, a conservative, and a feminist - to argue that their philosophy best represents the principles underlying the laws of sexuality and laws of violence in Australia.
Publication Type: Thesis Masters Research
Field of Research Codes: 180110 Criminal Law and Procedure
180122 Legal Theory, Jurisprudence and Legal Interpretation
169999 Studies in Human Society not elsewhere classified
Rights Statement: Copyright 2012 - Anthony Schuyler Marinac
HERDC Category Description: T1 Thesis - Masters Degree by Research
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 759
Views: 773
Downloads: 134
Appears in Collections:School of Law
Thesis Masters Research

Files in This Item:
9 files
File Description SizeFormat 
open/MARCXML.xmlMARCXML.xml3.03 kBUnknownView/Open
open/SOURCE03.pdfSOURCE03.pdf139.8 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
open/SOURCE04.pdfSOURCE04.pdf690.2 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
1 2 Next
Show full item record

Page view(s)

188
checked on Mar 5, 2019

Download(s)

66
checked on Mar 5, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

 

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

 

Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.