Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/11322
Title: | Influence of light/dark incubation on social behaviour in domestic chicks | Contributor(s): | Wichman, Anette (author); Freire, Rafael (author); Rogers, Lesley (author) | Publication Date: | 2006 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/11322 | Abstract: | The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of light exposure during the last days of incubation on the social behaviour of domestic chickens. This exposure is known to lead to asymmetry in one of the visual pathways and to lateralization of visual behaviour. Day-old male chicks (White Leghorn x Australorp cross) were housed in groups of eight in three different treatments pre-hatching (six groups/treatment) 1) Dark; chicks incubated in dark during the last five days of incubation 2) Light; chicks exposed to light over the same period before hatching and 3) Mixed; four light and four dark incubated chicks. Each day from day three to seven social pecking was recorded (20 minutes/day) and competition for food was tested. On day nine a vigilance test was carried out where each group of chicks was exposed to an overhead image of a predator. We found no difference between the treatments in the amount of social pecking performed. The lowest ranking individuals in the Dark groups gained more access to food compared to the lowest ranking individuals in the Light and Mixed groups (P=0.041, F2,43=3.44), indicating that groups comprised of chicks without visual lateralization (Dark groups) had formed a less rigid social structure. More dark incubated chicks than light incubated chicks reacted the first time the image of the predator was presented (P=0.033, F2,15=4.30), but when tested in social isolation, dark-incubated chicks were less responsive to an overhead predator (Rogers et al., 2004, Proc. R. Soc. 271, s420-s422). These opposite results suggest that Dark chicks are more influenced by the social context than Light chicks. Differences between treatments implies that manipulating incubation conditions may be a means to improve welfare. | Publication Type: | Conference Publication | Conference Details: | ISAE 2006: 40th Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, Bristol, United Kingdom, 8th - 12th August, 2006 | Source of Publication: | Proceedings of the 40th International Congress of the ISAE, p. 25-25 | Publisher: | International Society for Applied Ethology (ISAE) | Place of Publication: | Melbourne, Australia | Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 070203 Animal Management 070202 Animal Growth and Development 070201 Animal Breeding |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 970106 Expanding Knowledge in the Biological Sciences 830309 Poultry 970107 Expanding Knowledge in the Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences |
HERDC Category Description: | E3 Extract of Scholarly Conference Publication | Publisher/associated links: | http://www.applied-ethology.org/hres/2006%20isae%20in%20bristol_%20uk.pdf http://www.applied-ethology.org/isae_meetings.html |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Conference Publication School of Science and Technology |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format |
---|
Page view(s)
1,148
checked on Mar 3, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.