Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/10268
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPanetta, F Daneen
dc.contributor.authorCacho, Oscar Jen
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-28T11:14:00Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Applied Ecology, 49(2), p. 311-321en
dc.identifier.issn1365-2664en
dc.identifier.issn1472-0043en
dc.identifier.issn0021-8901en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/10268-
dc.description.abstract1. Eradication is often the preferred strategy in the management of new weed invasions, but recent research has shown that the circumstances under which eradication can be achieved are highly constrained. Containment is a component of an eradication strategy and also a management objective in its own right. Just as for eradication, containment of a weed invasion should be attempted only if it is considered feasible. However, very little guidance exists for the assessment of containment feasibility for weeds. 2. Numerous factors have been proposed as influencing feasibility of containment, but those that relate to the potential for management of dispersal pathways and timely detection of new foci of infestation appear to be critical. Theory suggests that the rate of spread is largely driven by long-distance dispersal (LDD). However, LDD is generally unpredictable and often occurs for species that do not appear to be adapted for it. Furthermore, many (if not most) LDD events fail to give rise to new infestations. 3. As the probability of colonisation is related to the numbers of propagules immigrating ('propagule pressure') at a point in the landscape, dispersal pathways that move relatively large numbers of propagules simultaneously and/or repeatedly should most enhance weed spread. It is these pathways whose potential for management has the greatest bearing upon containment feasibility. A key impediment to containment is undetected spread; this need not occur through LDD and is more likely to occur through dispersal to lesser distances. 4. Synthesis and applications. Feasibility of containment should be viewed in terms of the effort required to reduce weed spread rate, as well as the effectiveness of relevant management actions. Where dispersal vectors are not readily manageable and the probability of detection via structured and/or unstructured surveillance is low, a much greater reliance upon fecundity control will be needed to contain a weed. A combination of empirical and theoretical approaches should be used to develop and refine estimates of containment feasibility. Such estimates will aid decision-making with regard to whether to attempt to reduce weed spread and assist in prioritisation of different weeds for containment.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltden
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Ecologyen
dc.titleBeyond fecundity control: which weeds are most containable?en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02105.xen
dcterms.accessRightsGolden
dc.subject.keywordsEnvironment and Resource Economicsen
dc.subject.keywordsNatural Resource Managementen
dc.subject.keywordsInvasive Species Ecologyen
local.contributor.firstnameF Daneen
local.contributor.firstnameOscar Jen
local.subject.for2008050103 Invasive Species Ecologyen
local.subject.for2008050209 Natural Resource Managementen
local.subject.for2008140205 Environment and Resource Economicsen
local.subject.seo2008960405 Control of Pests, Diseases and Exotic Species at Regional or Larger Scalesen
local.profile.schoolUNE Business Schoolen
local.profile.emailocacho@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20120402-100040en
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.format.startpage311en
local.format.endpage321en
local.identifier.scopusid84859159972en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume49en
local.identifier.issue2en
local.title.subtitlewhich weeds are most containable?en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnamePanettaen
local.contributor.lastnameCachoen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:ocachoen
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-1542-4442en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:10463en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleBeyond fecundity controlen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorPanetta, F Daneen
local.search.authorCacho, Oscar Jen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.identifier.wosid000302070900002en
local.year.published2012en
local.subject.for2020380105 Environment and resource economicsen
local.subject.for2020410202 Biosecurity science and invasive species ecologyen
local.subject.for2020410406 Natural resource managementen
local.subject.seo2020180602 Control of pests, diseases and exotic species in terrestrial environmentsen
local.codeupdate.date2021-12-21T14:36:25.844en
local.codeupdate.epersonocacho@une.edu.auen
local.codeupdate.finalisedtrueen
local.original.for2020410202 Biosecurity science and invasive species ecologyen
local.original.for2020410406 Natural resource managementen
local.original.for2020380105 Environment and resource economicsen
local.original.seo2020undefineden
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

23
checked on Mar 16, 2024

Page view(s)

1,136
checked on Mar 8, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.