Review

Title
Review
Publication Date
2011
Author(s)
Clarke, Andrew
Devereaux, John
Werren, Julia C
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6750-5212
Email: jwerren@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:jwerren
Editor
Editor(s): Andrew Clarke, John Devereux, Julia Werren
Type of document
Book Chapter
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
LexisNexis Butterworths
Place of publication
Chatswood, Australia
Edition
2
UNE publication id
une:10455
Abstract
As we have seen, many legal-writing tasks have a degree of overlap. A first-year student essay may well have, when broken down, many of the same elements as a judgment penned by a judge. Legal problem-solving exercises, whether set as learning tasks or as the result of evidence in court or client instructions in practice, have a fairly irreducible set of matters to be covered. These include: • an appreciation of who the parties are; • the legal issues in play; • the analysis of those issues; • preliminary advice based on the available facts; and • ways and means of advancing the issues and resolving matters. This is where the various problem-solving frameworks become useful.
Link
Citation
Torts: A Practical Learning Approach, p. 789-816
ISBN
9780409327717
9780409331356
Start page
789
End page
816

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink