Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Review||Contributor(s):||Clarke, Andrew (author); Devereaux, John (author); Werren, Julia C (author)||Publication Date:||2011||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/10260||Abstract:||As we have seen, many legal-writing tasks have a degree of overlap. A first-year student essay may well have, when broken down, many of the same elements as a judgment penned by a judge. Legal problem-solving exercises, whether set as learning tasks or as the result of evidence in court or client instructions in practice, have a fairly irreducible set of matters to be covered. These include: • an appreciation of who the parties are; • the legal issues in play; • the analysis of those issues; • preliminary advice based on the available facts; and • ways and means of advancing the issues and resolving matters. This is where the various problem-solving frameworks become useful.||Publication Type:||Book Chapter||Source of Publication:||Torts: A Practical Learning Approach, p. 789-816||Publisher:||LexisNexis Butterworths||Place of Publication:||Chatswood, Australia||ISBN:||9780409327717
|Field of Research (FOR):||180126 Tort Law||HERDC Category Description:||B3 Chapter in a Revision/New Edition of a Book||Other Links:||http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/38161599||Statistics to Oct 2018:||Visitors: 71
|Appears in Collections:||Book Chapter|
Files in This Item:
checked on Mar 22, 2019
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.