Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/10260
Title: Review
Contributor(s): Clarke, Andrew (author); Devereaux, John (author); Werren, Julia C  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2011
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/10260
Abstract: As we have seen, many legal-writing tasks have a degree of overlap. A first-year student essay may well have, when broken down, many of the same elements as a judgment penned by a judge. Legal problem-solving exercises, whether set as learning tasks or as the result of evidence in court or client instructions in practice, have a fairly irreducible set of matters to be covered. These include: • an appreciation of who the parties are; • the legal issues in play; • the analysis of those issues; • preliminary advice based on the available facts; and • ways and means of advancing the issues and resolving matters. This is where the various problem-solving frameworks become useful.
Publication Type: Book Chapter
Source of Publication: Torts: A Practical Learning Approach, p. 789-816
Publisher: LexisNexis Butterworths
Place of Publication: Chatswood, Australia
ISBN: 9780409327717
9780409331356
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 180126 Tort Law
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 949999 Law, Politics and Community Services not elsewhere classified
HERDC Category Description: B3 Chapter in a Revision/New Edition of a Book
Publisher/associated links: http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/38161599
Editor: Editor(s): Andrew Clarke, John Devereux, Julia Werren
Appears in Collections:Book Chapter

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

1,628
checked on Mar 8, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.