Bariatric surgery revisions and private health insurance

Title
Bariatric surgery revisions and private health insurance
Publication Date
2017
Author(s)
Meyer, Samantha B
Thompson, Campbell
Hakendorf, Paul
Horwood, Chris
McNaughton, Darlene
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0131-5966
Email: dmcnaug3@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:dmcnaug3
Gray, John
Ward, Paul R
Mwanri, Lillian
Booth, Sue
Kow, Lilian
Chisholm, Jacob
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Place of publication
The Netherlands
DOI
10.1016/j.orcp.2017.04.009
UNE publication id
une:1959.11/59068
Abstract

Objective: To identify: 1. The percentage of bariatric procedures that are revisions" 2. What proportion of bariatric revision procedures in public hospitals are for patients whose primary weight loss procedure occurred in a private hospital" 3. The age, sex and level of socioeconomic disadvantage of patients needing revisions.

Methods: An analysis of patient level admission data from the Integrated South Australian Activity Collection (ISAAC) was performed. Data were collected on all revisions for weight loss related procedures at all South Australian public and private hospitals, between 2000—2015 using the ISAAC codes for revision procedures.

Results: 12,606 bariatric procedures occurred in hospitals" ∼27% of which represent a revision (n = 3366). Of these revisions, ∼82% occurred in a private hospital (n = 2771), and ∼18% occurred in a public hospital (n = 595). Of the 595 revisions in a public hospital, 51% of patients had their original bariatric procedure performed in a private hospital. The majority of patients who had a revision procedure are female (≥82%) with a mean age of ∼45. Individuals from the lowest 2 IRSD quintiles were over-represented for public hospital revisions and primary bariatric procedures.

Link
Citation
Obesity Research and Clinical Practice, 11(5), p. 616-621
ISSN
1878-0318
1871-403X
Start page
616
End page
621

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink