Models and frameworks of mental health recovery: a scoping review of the available literature

Title
Models and frameworks of mental health recovery: a scoping review of the available literature
Publication Date
2025-03
Author(s)
Gyamfi, Naomi
Bhullar, Navjot
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1616-6094
Email: nbhulla2@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:nbhulla2
Islam, Md Shahidul
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8984-8689
Email: mislam27@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:mislam27
Usher, Kim
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9686-5003
Email: kusher@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:kusher
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Routledge
Place of publication
United Kingdom
DOI
10.1080/09638237.2022.2069713
UNE publication id
une:1959.11/54576
Abstract

Background

The recovery approach involves providing a holistic and integrated service that is centered on and adapts to the aspirations and needs of consumers, who are seen as the expert on their health and well-being. Evidence is needed to address the current ambiguities related to the concept of recovery and its application.

Aim

A scoping review was conducted to identify papers describing theories, models, and frameworks of recovery to delineate the central domains of recovery.

Methods

Three literature search strategies were used: electronic database searching; hand-searching of key journals; and a reference list review of included papers. Inclusion criteria outlined theories, models and frameworks developed to support consumers' recovery and those supporting mental health professionals (MHPs) to deliver recovery-oriented services.

Results

Twelve studies (eleven articles and one book) were included in the review. The dimensions of recovery were synthesized into a framework named the Consolidated Framework for Recovery-oriented Services (CFRS). There are three domains within the framework: mechanisms/strategies; recovery as an internal process; and recovery as an external process. Each of these domains, as well as their relationships, are discussed.

Conclusions

The CFRS can be used by practitioners, researchers, funders, and collaborative members to conceptualize, implement, and evaluate recovery-oriented services.

Link
Citation
Journal of Mental Health, 34(2), p. 153-165
ISSN
1360-0567
0963-8237
Pubmed ID
35535928
Start page
153
End page
165

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink