Review of Alison Duxbury and Matthew Groves (eds), 'Military Justice in the Modern Age' (Cambridge, 2016)

Title
Review of Alison Duxbury and Matthew Groves (eds), 'Military Justice in the Modern Age' (Cambridge, 2016)
Publication Date
2016
Author(s)
Moore, Cameron
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5272-624X
Email: cmoore6@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:cmoore6
Type of document
Review
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Brill - Nijhoff
Place of publication
Netherlands
DOI
10.1163/18754112-02003009
UNE publication id
une:22380
Abstract
Injustice can have serious consequences for an individual. Ill-discipline in the military can have disastrous consequences for society. The Mutiny Act of 1689 immediately followed the Glorious Revolution because, despite the deep parliamentary mistrust of standing armies after the English Civil War, Jacobite forces threatened and a standing army seemed indispensable. This was the beginning of parliamentary discipline legislation in the common law world. The Preamble to the Act clearly stated the tensions at play . ... whereas no man may be forejudged of life or limb, or subjected to any kind of punishment by martial law, or in any other manner than by the judgment of his peers and according to the known and established laws of this realm; yet nevertheless, it being requisite for retaining such forces as are or shall be raised during this exigence of affairs in their duty [that] an exact discipline be observed, and that soldiers who shall mutiny or stir up sedition or shall desert their majesties' service be brought to a more exemplary and speedy punishment than the usual forms oflaw will allow.
Link
Citation
Journal of International Peacekeeping, 20(3-4), p. 303-310
ISSN
1875-4112
1875-4104
Start page
303
End page
310

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink