Parallels between biological invasions and human migration are flawed and undermine both disciplines. Response to Ahmed et al.

Title
Parallels between biological invasions and human migration are flawed and undermine both disciplines. Response to Ahmed et al.
Author(s)
South, Josie
Barbulescu, Roxana
Macêdo, Rafael L
Musseau, Camille L
Guareschi, Simone
Alamenciak, Tim
Alberti, Gabriella
Allen, Sylvie
Bacher, Sven
Baker, Emma
Benson, Michaela
Bernard-Verdier, Maud
Bibi, Rashida
Boatcă, Manuela
Bolpagni, Rossano
Brown, Timothy M
Byrne, Bridget
Canavan, Susan
Neira Castro, Esther
Conlon, Deirdre
Demoule, Jean-Paul
Dunn, Alison M
Faist, Thomas
Garelli, Glenda
Gervazoni, Paula
Gidley, Ben
Gippet, Jérôme M W
Harwood, Matthew
Heger, Tina
Henke, Theresa
Hill, Sara
Hobbs, Joshua
Hodson, James
Holmes, George
Hulme, Phillip E
Jones, Hannah
Khosa, Dumisani
Kilkey, Majella
Kontou, Danai
Lavanchy, Anne
Lewis, Hannah
Giralt, Rosa Mas
Meyerson, Laura A
Novoa, Ana
Pattison, Zarah
Pipek, Pavel
Probert, Anna F
Pyšek, Petr
Ricciardi, Anthony
Roberts, Jonathan David
Ruland, Florian
Saul, Wolf-Christian
Shackleton, Ross
Sigona, Nando
Simberloff, Daniel
Solomos, John
Sun, Li
Waite, Louise
Wilson, Pip
Yannelli, Florencia A
Vathi, Zana
Yemane, Tesfalem
Vieten, Ulrike M
Vimercati, Giovanni
Zambelli, Elena
Lieurance, Deah
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Place of publication
United States of America
DOI
10.1093/biosci/biaf073
UNE publication id
une:1959.11/70842
Abstract

A recent article by Ahmed and colleagues (2025) attempt to draw parallels and assess distinctions between biological invasions and human migration. This comparison conflates two globally occurring phenomena in a scientifically flawed way and risks the misappropriation of scientific concepts for ideological and political agendas. The repeated use of similarity and parallels throughout the text, including in the title, could easily lead to misconceptions among broader audiences, such as educators and policymakers, who can help shape public discourse. Despite their acknowledgement that comparing introductions of nonnative species with human migration “may be inappropriate and cause confusion,” Ahmed and colleagues argue that it reveals “complex parallels that are potentially fruitful to explore.” However, they fail to make their case.

Link
Citation
BioScience, p. 1-3
ISSN
1525-3244
0006-3568
Start page
1
End page
3

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink