Accounting for the Cost of Reproductive Technologies During Selection in Sheep Breeding Programs

Title
Accounting for the Cost of Reproductive Technologies During Selection in Sheep Breeding Programs
Publication Date
2015
Author(s)
Granleese, Tom
Clark, Sam A
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8605-1738
Email: sclark37@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:sclark37
Swan, Andrew
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8048-3169
Email: aswan@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:aswan
Van Der Werf, Julius H
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2512-1696
Email: jvanderw@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:jvanderw
Editor
Editor(s): Kim Bunter, Tim Byrne, Hans Daetwyler, Susanne Hermesch, Kathryn Kemper, James Kijas, David Nation, Wayne Pitchford, Suzanne Rowe, Matt Shaffer, Alison van Eenennaam
Type of document
Conference Publication
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics (AAABG)
Place of publication
Armidale, Australia
UNE publication id
une:19235
Abstract
Female reproductive technologies, such as MOET and JIVET, have been shown to increase the rate of genetic gain. However, they incur substantial costs to breeders using them. In this work, optimal contribution selection was used to find the balance between genetic merit, co-ancestry and cost of reproductive technologies in sheep breeding programs. To offset the cost of using the reproductive technologies, breeders received a premium based on the value of the genetic gain achieved by the ram buyers. Australian terminal sire and Merino breeding programs were simulated, using industry indexes. For the terminal sire breeding program, the premium needed to be greater than 50% beforen reproductive technologies were used. In the Merino breeding program, where the standard deviation of the index is 3 times higher than the terminal index, reproductive technologies were used with lower premiums (6% and 32% premiums, respectively). For both breeding programs, the rate of genetic gain increased with more allocations of reproductive technologies. There was also a higher proportion of JIVET assigned compared to MOET, due to a lower cost per lamb. The benefits of genomic selection were greatest in the merino program, due to the higher use of JIVET. Assigning costs of reproductive technologies allows for robust and practical breeding programs to be designed.
Link
Citation
Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics, v.21, p. 33-36
ISSN
1328-3227
ISBN
9780646945545
Start page
33
End page
36

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink