Effects of truncation and false positives in selection of markers for genomic prediction

Title
Effects of truncation and false positives in selection of markers for genomic prediction
Publication Date
2022
Author(s)
Loh, Z
van der Werf, J H J
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2512-1696
Email: jvanderw@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:jvanderw
Clark, S
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8605-1738
Email: sclark37@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:sclark37
Editor
Editor(s): R F Veerkamp and Y de Haas
Type of document
Conference Publication
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Wageningen Academic
Place of publication
Wageningen, The Netherlands
DOI
10.3920/978-90-8686-940-4_285
UNE publication id
une:1959.11/55419
Abstract
Association studies are often used to select genetic markers for genomic prediction, requiring truncation with a balance between power and false positives. Using simulation, the aim for this study is to test the effects of truncation on prediction accuracy and particularly the impact of false positives in SNP selection. Bonferroni and Benjamini-Hochberg False Discovery Rate methods were tested. Our study suggested that except for polygenic traits, truncation with a more lenient threshold such as the Benjamini-Hochberg False Discovery Rate increases the genomic prediction accuracy. In an inbred population, false positives could contribute positively to the accuracy especially for a oligogenic trait, although further study would be needed to generalize this result. Our study suggested that for a polygenic trait, all markers should be included in genomic prediction, and if SNP selection were to be applied a lenient threshold for truncation would be desirable.
Link
Citation
Proceedings of 12th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (WCGALP), p. 1201-1204
ISBN
9789086869404
Start page
1201
End page
1204
Rights
Attribution 4.0 International

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink