Pasture fertilisation with sulfur enhanced fertilizer

Title
Pasture fertilisation with sulfur enhanced fertilizer
Publication Date
2010
Author(s)
Flavel, Richard
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7867-2104
Email: rflavel3@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:rflavel3
Guppy, Christopher
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7274-607X
Email: cguppy@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:cguppy
Blair, Graeme
Editor
Editor(s): Robert Gilkes, Nattaporn Prakougkep
Type of document
Conference Publication
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
International Union of Soil Sciences and Australian Society of Soil Science Inc
Place of publication
Brisbane, Australia
UNE publication id
une:6660
Abstract
An evaluation of a Sulfur Enhanced Fertilizer (Thiogro) fertilizer (MAP12) was undertaken on a native pasture oversown with clover near Armidale, NSW, Australia from August 2007 to November 2008. Fertilizers (Single superphosphate (SSP), mono-ammonium phosphate (MAP), pastille DAPS (pastille) and Sulfur enhanced mono-ammonium phosphate 12 (MAP12)) were top dressed onto the sward and four harvests taken over the period. SSP and MAP12 produced higher clover yields than MAP and pastille DAPS. MAP12 was superior to SSP, particularly at the later harvests. This is an important result as clover growth is essential in the pasture both to contribute fixed N and for animal protein. Addition of S fertilizers increased the uptake of S in all treatments, except pastille DAPS. Highest uptake was with MAP12. Calculation of apparent fertilizer recovery (S uptake in S treatment - S uptake in MAP treatment)/ S applied) showed a recovery of 16% from SSP, 32% from MAP12 and no recovery from DAP pastille. The increased yield resulting from S application resulted in an increase in the apparent recovery of fertilizer P.
Link
Citation
Proceedings of the 19th World Congress of Soil Science: Soil Solutions for a Changing World, p. 180-183
ISBN
9780646537832
Start page
180
End page
183

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink