Inter-comparison of remote sensing platforms for height estimation of mango and avocado tree crowns

Title
Inter-comparison of remote sensing platforms for height estimation of mango and avocado tree crowns
Publication Date
2020
Author(s)
Wu, Dan
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5762-8980
Email: arobson7@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:arobson7
Johansen, Kasper
Phinn, Stuart
Robson, Andrew
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5762-8980
Email: arobson7@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:arobson7
Tu, Yu-Hsuan
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Place of publication
The Netherlands
DOI
10.1016/j.jag.2020.102091
UNE publication id
une:1959.11/58645
Abstract

To support the adoption of precision agricultural practices in horticultural tree crops, prior research has investigated the relationship between crop vigour (height, canopy density, health) as measured by remote sensing technologies, to fruit quality, yield and pruning requirements. However, few studies have compared the accuracy of different remote sensing technologies for the estimation of tree height. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy, flexibility, aerial coverage and limitations of five techniques to measure the height of two types of horticultural tree crops, mango and avocado trees. Canopy height estimates from Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) were used as a reference dataset against height estimates from Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) data, WorldView-3 (WV-3) stereo imagery, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) based RGB and multi-spectral imagery, and field measurements. Overall, imagery obtained from the UAV platform were found to provide tree height measurement comparable to that from the TLS (R2 = 0.89, RMSE = 0.19 m and rRMSE = 5.37 % for mango trees" R2 = 0.81, RMSE = 0.42 m and rRMSE = 4.75 % for avocado trees), although coverage area is limited to 1–10 km2 due to battery life and line-of-sight flight regulations. The ALS data also achieved reasonable accuracy for both mango and avocado trees (R2 = 0.67, RMSE = 0.24 m and rRMSE = 7.39 % for mango trees" R2 = 0.63, RMSE = 0.43 m and rRMSE = 5.04 % for avocado trees), providing both optimal point density and flight altitude, and therefore offers an effective platform for large areas (10 km2 –100 km2 ). However, cost and availability of ALS data is a consideration. WV-3 stereo imagery produced the lowest accuracies for both tree crops (R2 = 0.50, RMSE = 0.84 m and rRMSE = 32.64 % for mango trees" R2 = 0.45, RMSE = 0.74 m and rRMSE = 8.51 % for avocado trees) when compared to other remote sensing platforms, but may still present a viable option due to cost and commercial availability when large area coverage is required. This research provides industries and growers with valuable information on how to select the most appropriate approach and the optimal parameters for each remote sensing platform to assess canopy height for mango and avocado trees.

Link
Citation
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, v.89, p. 1-15
ISSN
1872-826X
1569-8432
Start page
1
End page
15
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink
openpublished/IntercomparisonRobson2020JournalArticle.htm 175.304 KB Published version View document