Brown, Peter J

Author(s)

Brown, Peter J

Publication Date

2010

Abstract

There has been a protracted debate over the evidence for intentional cranial modification in the terminal Pleistocene Australian crania from Kow Swamp and Coobool Creek. Resolution of this debate is crucial to interpretations of the significance of morphological variation within terminal Pleistocene - early Holocene Australian skeletal materials and claims of a regional evolutionary sequence linking Javan 'Homo erectus' and Australian 'Homo sapiens'. However, morphological comparisons of terminal Pleistocene and recent Australian crania are complicated by the significantly greater average body mass in the former. Raw and size-adjusted metric comparisons of the terminal Pleistocene skeleton from Nacurrie, south-eastern Australia, with modified and unmodified 'H. sapiens' and 'H. erectus', identified a suite of traits in the frontal, parietal, and occipital bones associated with intentional modification of a neonate's skull. These traits are also present in some of the crania from Kow Swamp and Coobool Creek, which are in close geographic proximity to Nacurrie, but not in unmodified 'H. sapiens' or Javan 'H. erectus'. Frontal bone morphology in 'H. erectus' was distinct from all of the Australian 'H. sapiens' samples. During the first six months of life, Nacurrie's vault may have been shaped by his mother's hands, rather than through the application of fixed bandages. Whether this behaviour persisted only for several generations, or hundreds of years, remains unknown. The reasons behind the shaping of Nacurrie's head, aesthetics or otherwise, and why this cultural practice was adopted and subsequently discontinued, will always remain a matter of speculation.

Citation

Journal of Human Evolution, 59(2), p. 168-187

ISSN

1095-8606

0047-2484

Link