Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30169
Title: Portable X-ray fluorescence for environmental assessment of soils: Not just a point and shoot method
Contributor(s): Ravansari, Roozbeh  (author); Wilson, Susan C  (author)orcid ; Tighe, Matthew  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2020-01
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105250Open Access Link
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30169
Abstract: Portable XRF is a rapid, mobile, high throughput, and potentially cost effective instrumental analytical technique capable of elemental assessment. It is widely used for environmental assessment of soils in a variety of contexts such as agriculture and pollution both in-situ and ex-situ, to varying levels of success. Portable XRF performance for soil analysis is often validated against wet chemistry techniques but a range of factors may give rise to elementally dependent disparities affecting accuracy and precision assessments. These include heterogeneity, analysis times, instrument stability during analyses, protective thin films, incident X-rays, sample thickness, sample width, analyte interferences, detector resolution, power source fluctuations and instrumental drift. Light elements comprising water and organic matter (i.e. carbon, oxygen) also negatively affect measurements due to X-ray scattering and attenuation. The often-overlooked phenomenon of variability in both soil organic matter and water can also affect soil density (e.g. shrink-swell clays) and thus sample critical thickness which in turn affects the effective volume of sample analyzed. Compounding this, for elements having lower characteristic fluorescence energy, effective volumes of analyses are lower and thus measurements may not be representative of the whole sample. Understanding the effects and interplay between determined elemental concentrations and soil organic matter, water, and critical thickness together with the subtlety of theoretical effective volumes of analyses will help analysts mitigate potential problems and assess the applicability, advantages and limitations of PXRF for a given site. We demonstrate that with careful consideration of these factors and a systematic approach to analysis which we summarize and present, PXRF can provide highly accurate results.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Environment International, v.134, p. 1-14
Publisher: Elsevier Ltd
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 1873-6750
0160-4120
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 050205 Environmental Management
050206 Environmental Monitoring
050304 Soil Chemistry (excl. Carbon Sequestration Science)
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 410404 Environmental management
410604 Soil chemistry and soil carbon sequestration (excl. carbon sequestration science)
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 960908 Mining Land and Water Management
960911 Urban and Industrial Land Management
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 180699 Terrestrial systems and management not elsewhere classified
180607 Terrestrial erosion
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/PortableWilsonTighe2020JournalArticle.pdfPublished version2.22 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons